A comparative study in left-sided breast cancer treated with moderate deep inspiratory breath hold versus free breathing.

BACKGROUND: The moderate deep inspiratory breath hold (mDIBH) is a modality famed for cardiac sparing. Prospective studies based on this are few from the eastern part of the world and India. We intend to compare the dosimetry between mDIBH and free-breathing (FB) plans. METHODS: Thirty-two locally advanced left breast cancer patients were taken up for the study. All patients received a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the chest wall/intact breast, followed by a 10-Gy boost to the lumpectomy cavity in the case of breast conservation surgery. All the patients were treated in mDIBH using active breath coordinator (ABC). The data from the two dose volume histograms were compared regarding plan quality and the doses received by the organs at risk. Paired t-test was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The dose received by the heart in terms of V5, V10, and V30 (4.55% vs 8.39%) and mean dose (4.73 Gy vs 6.74 Gy) were statistically significant in the ABC group than that in the FB group (all p-values < 0.001). Also, the dose received by the LADA in terms of V30 (19.32% vs 24.87%) and mean dose (32.99 Gy vs 46.65 Gy) were significantly less in the ABC group. The mean treatment time for the ABC group was 20 min, while that for the free-breathing group was 10 min. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating ABC-mDIBH for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy significantly reduces the doses received by the heart, LADA, and left and right lung, with no compromise in plan quality but with an increase in treatment time.

Role of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Real-World Data From a Tertiary Care Institute in Eastern India.

Introduction CDK4/6 inhibitors currently approved for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer include palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. This study aims to report on the treatment outcomes and real-world data regarding the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer at a tertiary care institute in Eastern India. Materials and methods The present study is a retrospective analysis of data from patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors at a tertiary care institute in Eastern India between 2015 and 2022. The data were collected from online records in the departmental files and analyzed for the primary baseline characteristics of the patients, tumors, and response rates, including partial response (PR), complete response (CR), progressive disease (PD), and stable disease (SD), as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1. The treatment administered, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were also evaluated. Results From 2015 to 2022, 24 eligible patients were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. The average duration of follow-up was 25 months. Out of the 24 patients, 15 (62.5%) were taking Tab. ribociclib, six (25%) were taking Tab. palbociclib, and three (12.5%) were taking Tab. abemaciclib. CDK4/6 was used as a first-line therapy for 16 patients, while eight patients received it as a second-line treatment. Out of the total number of patients, six (25%) had stable disease, 13 (54.2%) had a partial response, and four (16.7%) had progressive disease. In total, of the eligible patients, five (20.8%) had grade I neutropenia, seven (29.2%) had grade II neutropenia, and four (16.7%) had grade III neutropenia. At five years, the PFS rate estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 50% (95% CI: 47.89-69.31). Conclusion Ribociclib and palbociclib have improved PFS in patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Both drugs have well-tolerated toxicity, allowing patients to continue taking them for an extended period of time. CDK4/6 inhibitors have a higher response rate than the other agents.

Mono iso-centric VMAT planning for SBRT of multiple liver metastasis- A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The risk factors associated with the development of HCC are chronic Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and alcoholic cirrhosis. The standard care for HCC is surgical resection but the scope is limited for some patients. Continuous advancement of radiation therapy enabled the technique of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as an option for the treatment of those cases for which surgery cannot be done. According to recent literature and meta-analysis, SBRT is an optimum treatment method with high local control with low toxicity. In SBRT, radiation is delivered with a smaller number of fractions than conventional radiation and employs high-precision delivery and accuracy with the help of image guidance. From a series of retrospective and prospective studies, it has been confirmed that SBRT achieves excellent local control in patients with early-stage inoperable, intermediate-stage, and advanced diseases. BACKGROUND: A 42-year-old male patient related to HBeAg infection and high AFP levels developed HCC BCLC Stage A was admitted to our department. There were two lesions with PTV volumes of 41.07 cc and 9.573 cc with a distance between them of 3.51 cm. These two lesions were treated with a mono-isocentric VMAT planning with SBRT technique. In this case, we present an unusual clinical practice of mono-isocentric treatment planning for treating multiple liver lesions. Since radiation therapy was viewed as the primary form of treatment because the patient wasn't an ideal candidate for surgery, SBRT was selected as the patient's primary modality of treatment because of the tiny volume of the two lesions and the normal liver volume (>700cc). Triple-phase 4DCT was performed for simulation to account for the motion of target volume and normal structures. After delineating the target volume and other normal structures, treatment planning was done with a dose of 45 Gray which was to be delivered in 5 fractions. Two PTVs were created with a margin of 3.0 mm to IGTV. Considering the positions of the lesions, a single isocentre plan was created using a 6MV FFF photon beam for both the PTVs with the VMAT technique. The treatment was carried through with 3 arcs, one coplanar, and the other 2 non-coplanar. At the time of treatment, after the proper positioning of the patient, one CBCT image was taken to match with the planned CT image acquired at the time of the simulation. After applying the translational and rotational errors, the patient was treated. RESULTS: The patient was treated successfully. After treatment, the condition of the patient was normal, and no toxicities have been observed in follow-up. CONCLUSION: Mono isocentric VMAT planning can be used for closely spaced lesions considering the position of lesions and other normal structures in the vicinity.

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Masquerading as a Laryngeal Tumor: A Case Report.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) commonly metastasizes to various organs such as the lungs, liver, bones, and brain. However, isolated metastases to the head and neck region, especially the larynx, are very rare. This report presents a case of laryngeal growth that was eventually confirmed to be a metastatic deposit from an undiagnosed RCC. We report a case of a 66-year-old male who presented to the clinic with painless neck swelling and a change in voice. The scan showed a soft tissue mass in the thyroid cartilage. Histopathology of the resected laryngeal tumor confirmed metastatic clear cell carcinoma. A metastatic workup revealed a renal mass, and the patient underwent laparoscopic adrenal-sparing left cytoreductive nephrectomy. The histopathological examination established the diagnosis of clear cell RCC. Subsequently, the patient was treated with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. Follow-up imaging showed no residual or recurrent lesions. This case highlights the rarity of laryngeal metastasis from RCC and the importance of an accurate diagnosis through advanced imaging and histopathological examination.

Divided target optimization with volumetric modulated arc therapy planning to improve target coverage and homogeneity in lung radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate and evaluate the feasibility of a simple modified Divided Planning Target Volume (DPTV) optimization method in radiation therapy planning of lung cancer patients. METHODS: A cohort of 15 patients of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (13 patients stage III and two patients of stage II) who were previously treated with Concurrent Chemo Radiation Therapy were included in the study. The planning modality was Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and the dose prescription was 60 Gray in 30 fractions. In this study, we attempted to replan by dividing the previous Single Planning Target Volume (SPTV) into a DPTV. All the treatment plans were revised and again optimized for DPTV with required dose constraints as in SPTV. The dosimetric parameters that were achieved for target and normal structures were recorded in both the optimization methods. RESULTS: Dosimetric target coverage (D95%) (p-value = 0.0001), dose homogeneity (p-value =0.0001) and conformity (p-value = 0.044) were improved by the DPTV optimization. The volume of the oesophagus receiving 35 Gy was found to be higher in the DPTV arm (p-value = 0.02) compared to the SPTV arm, but the volume of the oesophagus receiving 50 Gy was found to be similar (p-value = 0.122). CONCLUSION: In radiation therapy planning of lung cancer, the DPTV optimization method has better dose coverage to the target volume, homogeneity, as well as conformity than the stsndsrd SPTV method. Therefore, the DPTV optimization method can be a simple and efficient alternative to the SPTV method in lung cancer.

Effect of treatment interruptions and outcomes in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care institute.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 patients with cancer had poorer outcomes due to immunosuppression during cancer care, poor general condition, and other comorbidities. The study was conducted to present the real-world analysis of the effect of treatment interruptions on the outcomes of patients treated with radiation therapy during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care institute in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective observational cohort study on cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy from March 2020 to January 2021. The study's primary outcome was to analyze the effect of treatment interruptions on the outcomes of patients treated with radiation therapy during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Between March 2020 to January 2021, 218 eligible patients undergoing radiation therapy were found for the study. Among the 218 patients, 25 patients (11.47%) were found positive for COVID-19, while 193 patients (88.53%) were negative for COVID-19. Among COVID-19-positive patients, ten patients had < 3 weeks of treatment interruption, while 15 patients had > 3 weeks of treatment interruptions. After recovering from COVID-19, treatment was resumed and completed for 15 (60.00%) of the COVID-19-positive patients. In comparison, 13 patients (52.00%) were lost to follow-up. Three of the COVID-19-positive patients died. The disease was clinically controlled in 12 (48.00%) of the COVID-19-positive patients, and the patients reported locoregional disease progression in 10 (40.00%). Among the 193 COVID-19-negative patients, 32 patients (16.58%) had treatment interruption. Twelve patients (37.50%) had treatment interruptions for less than 1 week. There was a significant difference in the delay of radiation treatment delivery by 2 weeks (11 fractions) in COVID-19-positive patients compared to only two fractions delay in COVID-19-negative patients. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 impacted the treatment outcomes in both COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative cohorts of patients. There was a longer duration of treatment interruptions in the COVID-19-positive patients, leading to fewer patients completing the radiation treatment and thereby increased locoregional disease progression. There was a significant difference in the delay in treatment between the two groups.

How prepared the radiotherapy centers are to deal with COVID-19 pandemic? A nationwide survey from 46 cancer centers across India.

Managing of radiotherapy department in many cancer centers in India has become very challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. A radiotherapy center has to deal with multiple problems such as long treatment duration of each patient, high caseload on each radiotherapy machine, a limited number of qualified technical staff available, and equipment maintenance. For the department's smooth running, both the patient and healthcare worker must be safe from contacting COVID-19. A robust and planned strategy is required for prevention, screening, and awareness among all. To access our preparedness and evolve by gaining from other radiotherapy centers, a study was conducted using questionnaires and responses collected from different cancer centers in India.

Tweaking of radiation and chemotherapy schedules is the new normal during the COVID-19 crisis: perspective from oncologists at a tertiary care health institute.

Patients with cancer are at a higher risk of infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) than the general population. In India, it has become a significant health problem of utmost importance, and India's Government has issued health advisories. Lockdown brought many unforeseen problems for patients and hospitals, leading to confusion and chaos. The aim of this article is to identify various issues related to our hospital, follow-up, nutrition, treatment and psychosocial issues. Multiple changes were made in the hospital, departmental and treatment policy for cancer patients' convenience and safety. As India is in the peak of COVID-19, these types of modifications and modifications of treatment schedules will be the 'New Normal'.

Surviving With Mycosis Fungoides for Twenty Years: An Autobiographical Case Report.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a low-grade chronic lymphoid proliferative disorder of T-lymphocytes arising out of the skin, having an indolent course caused by abnormal proliferation of CD4+ T-cells. Here we present a case of a 37-year-old male who was diagnosed with mycosis fungoides in 2001 and treated with Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy (TSEBT). The purpose of this autobiographical case report is to give an insight into the eventful journey of the patient living with the disease for the last 20 years. His journey will serve the purpose of both patients and physicians and will add to the literature on the subject.